<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Opera Admits @Font-Face Bugs In Opera 10</title>
	<atom:link href="http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/?utm_source=rss&amp;utm_medium=rss&amp;utm_campaign=opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10</link>
	<description>Tracking The Move From Print To The Networked Screen</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 14:54:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1154</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-1154</guid>
		<description>Thanks Patrick.
I&#039;ll check it out.
Not sure what you mean by the &quot;workaround suggested&quot; doesn&#039;t make any difference, though. Only on the second tab, or on any tab, or what?
The Opera devs must be pretty aggravated over all this and I&#039;m sure they are most definitely working on it. Of that I have little doubt. And, thankfully, those of us who use Opera - even if it&#039;s only a part of the development process - are frequent upgraders so let&#039;s hope this situation turns out to be very temporary.
Regards, rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Patrick.<br />
I&#8217;ll check it out.<br />
Not sure what you mean by the &#8220;workaround suggested&#8221; doesn&#8217;t make any difference, though. Only on the second tab, or on any tab, or what?<br />
The Opera devs must be pretty aggravated over all this and I&#8217;m sure they are most definitely working on it. Of that I have little doubt. And, thankfully, those of us who use Opera &#8211; even if it&#8217;s only a part of the development process &#8211; are frequent upgraders so let&#8217;s hope this situation turns out to be very temporary.<br />
Regards, rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-1153</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-1153</guid>
		<description>This is not the only bug that Opera has. I made a screencast showing that if you use two different tabs of the same page, the second one does not display the font:
http://screenr.com/bWN

And the workaround suggested by Opera does not make any difference.

Pat</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not the only bug that Opera has. I made a screencast showing that if you use two different tabs of the same page, the second one does not display the font:<br />
<a href="http://screenr.com/bWN" rel="nofollow">http://screenr.com/bWN</a></p>
<p>And the workaround suggested by Opera does not make any difference.</p>
<p>Pat</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-709</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:41:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-709</guid>
		<description>@op
I&#039;m using the latest build of Opera 10 on Windows XP.  OTF files don&#039;t seem to be a problem.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@op<br />
I&#8217;m using the latest build of Opera 10 on Windows XP.  OTF files don&#8217;t seem to be a problem.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: op</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-707</link>
		<dc:creator>op</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 16:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-707</guid>
		<description>also opera 10 doesn&#039;t render otf at all (depending the build)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also opera 10 doesn&#8217;t render otf at all (depending the build)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique Ramírez</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-519</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique Ramírez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-519</guid>
		<description>@Richard
Agreed. Then again, I&#039;m quite possitive that, when @font-face booms, Opera will be ready to go. :)

Not saying it&#039;s not important. Just saying it&#039;s not critical.

@Tor
Man, that&#039;s awesome. I was going to search for a way to get my .eot files done, but you&#039;ve just saved me a couple of minutes googling. :) Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Richard<br />
Agreed. Then again, I&#8217;m quite possitive that, when @font-face booms, Opera will be ready to go. <img src='http://readableweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Not saying it&#8217;s not important. Just saying it&#8217;s not critical.</p>
<p>@Tor<br />
Man, that&#8217;s awesome. I was going to search for a way to get my .eot files done, but you&#8217;ve just saved me a couple of minutes googling. <img src='http://readableweb.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-514</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-514</guid>
		<description>Tor,
&lt;i&gt;Love&lt;/i&gt; your &lt;a href=&quot;http://m70.no/webfonts&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;page&lt;/a&gt;, dog. Made me laugh. And useful, too, a double win.
My musical taste runs more to Be-Bop (as in Charlie Parker, circa 1950) than Hip-Hop, but I&#039;ve got to start listening more, really.
(I&#039;m a musician and I find something to like in just about any style.)
Anyway, I put together a page of screen shots showing the differences in rendering between Opera 10 and FF 3.5 for your Design Commandments page:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://readableweb.com/webfonttest/opera-fontshots.htm&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Web Font Rendering Analysis&lt;/a&gt;
Needless to say, there should not be a difference in bolding.
RE: Launching Chrome with Web Fonts Enabled  - Paul Irish has done the work. Check out:
http://paulirish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/chrome-exe-remote-fonts-switch.png
http://paulirish.com/2009/chrome-and-font-face-a-summary/
Cheers, Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tor,<br />
<i>Love</i> your <a href="http://m70.no/webfonts" rel="nofollow">page</a>, dog. Made me laugh. And useful, too, a double win.<br />
My musical taste runs more to Be-Bop (as in Charlie Parker, circa 1950) than Hip-Hop, but I&#8217;ve got to start listening more, really.<br />
(I&#8217;m a musician and I find something to like in just about any style.)<br />
Anyway, I put together a page of screen shots showing the differences in rendering between Opera 10 and FF 3.5 for your Design Commandments page:<br />
<a href="http://readableweb.com/webfonttest/opera-fontshots.htm" rel="nofollow">Web Font Rendering Analysis</a><br />
Needless to say, there should not be a difference in bolding.<br />
RE: Launching Chrome with Web Fonts Enabled  &#8211; Paul Irish has done the work. Check out:<br />
<a href="http://paulirish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/chrome-exe-remote-fonts-switch.png" rel="nofollow">http://paulirish.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/chrome-exe-remote-fonts-switch.png</a><br />
<a href="http://paulirish.com/2009/chrome-and-font-face-a-summary/" rel="nofollow">http://paulirish.com/2009/chrome-and-font-face-a-summary/</a><br />
Cheers, Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tor Løvskogen Bollingmo</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-510</link>
		<dc:creator>Tor Løvskogen Bollingmo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 07:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-510</guid>
		<description>What doesn&#039;t look right in Opera, Richard? The fonts embed in the newest Opera on WinXP. Altho&#039; the rendering is not great. The newset Chrome doesn&#039;t embed, but it does in your version? I don&#039;t bother with EOT for IE..., but made a page for easy to remember how to webfont: http://m70.no/webfonts</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What doesn&#8217;t look right in Opera, Richard? The fonts embed in the newest Opera on WinXP. Altho&#8217; the rendering is not great. The newset Chrome doesn&#8217;t embed, but it does in your version? I don&#8217;t bother with EOT for IE&#8230;, but made a page for easy to remember how to webfont: <a href="http://m70.no/webfonts" rel="nofollow">http://m70.no/webfonts</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-502</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:25:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-502</guid>
		<description>@enrique
Fairly stated.
However, that &quot;rarely implemented&quot; functionality will take off like a rocket very soon. @Font-Face is already supported in the large majority of user agents. (Safari and IE)
Once FF3.5 hits &quot;critical mass&quot;, web fonts will fly like crazy. Expect some weird pages.
@Tor
Your page, &lt;a href=&quot;http://designalized.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Design Commandments&lt;/a&gt;, looks wrong in Opera 10. But like I said, it looks great in Chrome, Safari, and FF3.5.
Are you planning on changing it to work with Opera as it now stands?
Will you be doing an IE version with EOT? I&#039;d love to see what changes are needed for it to render correctly cross-browser despite IE and Opera&#039;s requirements.
Later... rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@enrique<br />
Fairly stated.<br />
However, that &#8220;rarely implemented&#8221; functionality will take off like a rocket very soon. @Font-Face is already supported in the large majority of user agents. (Safari and IE)<br />
Once FF3.5 hits &#8220;critical mass&#8221;, web fonts will fly like crazy. Expect some weird pages.<br />
@Tor<br />
Your page, <a href="http://designalized.com/" rel="nofollow">Design Commandments</a>, looks wrong in Opera 10. But like I said, it looks great in Chrome, Safari, and FF3.5.<br />
Are you planning on changing it to work with Opera as it now stands?<br />
Will you be doing an IE version with EOT? I&#8217;d love to see what changes are needed for it to render correctly cross-browser despite IE and Opera&#8217;s requirements.<br />
Later&#8230; rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Enrique Ramírez</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-499</link>
		<dc:creator>Enrique Ramírez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-499</guid>
		<description>Ouch.

Quite a mistake from Opera. Yet, still a &lt;strong&gt;mistake&lt;/strong&gt;. It is a big deal, and it&#039;s quite a dissapointment for the Opera community. But having the balls to get out there and say &quot;Hey, we screw up&quot; is reason enough not to take any credibility away from the Opera crew.

As you point out, if IE did the same, it&#039;ll all be sticks and stones over the IE team. But then again, IE has a history of flawfullness whilst Opera has done things right so many times a &quot;small&quot; bump on the road is not reason enough to burn them altogether.

It is embarrassing, disappointing and kinda discouraging, but still, a minor tech issue on a (yet) rarely implemented functionality for a very small market share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ouch.</p>
<p>Quite a mistake from Opera. Yet, still a <strong>mistake</strong>. It is a big deal, and it&#8217;s quite a dissapointment for the Opera community. But having the balls to get out there and say &#8220;Hey, we screw up&#8221; is reason enough not to take any credibility away from the Opera crew.</p>
<p>As you point out, if IE did the same, it&#8217;ll all be sticks and stones over the IE team. But then again, IE has a history of flawfullness whilst Opera has done things right so many times a &#8220;small&#8221; bump on the road is not reason enough to burn them altogether.</p>
<p>It is embarrassing, disappointing and kinda discouraging, but still, a minor tech issue on a (yet) rarely implemented functionality for a very small market share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard Fink</title>
		<link>http://readableweb.com/opera-admits-font-face-bugs-in-opera-10/comment-page-1/#comment-497</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard Fink</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://readableweb.com/?p=1635#comment-497</guid>
		<description>Hi, Divya
First, see my answer to Tor. 
Second, it isn&#039;t a big deal. But worth noting? Yes.
A more interesting question, I &lt;i&gt;think&lt;/i&gt; is, &quot;Would it be a big deal if this bug popped up in the next release of IE?&quot;
Because if you don&#039;t think that the blogosphere would be howling about it if it &lt;b&gt;was&lt;/b&gt; a bug in IE Next, then we&#039;re using two different Internets.
(BTW - I think, but am not sure, that IE&#039;s current implementation of @font-face does have issues with weights similar to the way Opera behaves now. I think, at least in some scenarios, you do have to give the different weights different names and juggle a bit using font-family to get bold and oblique and whatever other weights are involved, working right. I&#039;ve yet to test.)
But to get back to the question: Is it not a big deal because &lt;b&gt;technically&lt;/b&gt; it&#039;s not a big deal? Or is it not a big deal because Opera&#039;s market share is very small and Opera users (like me, remember) are frequent upgraders and therefore web designers, as a practical matter, can just ignore the problem completely because, presumably, soon it will afflict so few users?
Sorry to be that blunt about it, but that&#039;s what the calculation comes down to.
That Opera&#039;s market share is still so tiny, after this many years, and especially after having been the only real alternative to IE6 for several of those years, &lt;b&gt;is&lt;/b&gt; strange. Something is amiss.
Cheers, Rich</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Divya<br />
First, see my answer to Tor.<br />
Second, it isn&#8217;t a big deal. But worth noting? Yes.<br />
A more interesting question, I <i>think</i> is, &#8220;Would it be a big deal if this bug popped up in the next release of IE?&#8221;<br />
Because if you don&#8217;t think that the blogosphere would be howling about it if it <b>was</b> a bug in IE Next, then we&#8217;re using two different Internets.<br />
(BTW &#8211; I think, but am not sure, that IE&#8217;s current implementation of @font-face does have issues with weights similar to the way Opera behaves now. I think, at least in some scenarios, you do have to give the different weights different names and juggle a bit using font-family to get bold and oblique and whatever other weights are involved, working right. I&#8217;ve yet to test.)<br />
But to get back to the question: Is it not a big deal because <b>technically</b> it&#8217;s not a big deal? Or is it not a big deal because Opera&#8217;s market share is very small and Opera users (like me, remember) are frequent upgraders and therefore web designers, as a practical matter, can just ignore the problem completely because, presumably, soon it will afflict so few users?<br />
Sorry to be that blunt about it, but that&#8217;s what the calculation comes down to.<br />
That Opera&#8217;s market share is still so tiny, after this many years, and especially after having been the only real alternative to IE6 for several of those years, <b>is</b> strange. Something is amiss.<br />
Cheers, Rich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
